Research Buyers Guide

The authoritative guide to research suppliers. Go

Research Jobfinder

The No.1 jobs resource for research and insight professionals. Go

The definitive source of research news and opinion. Go

Fair Data

The Fair Data mark helps consumers recognise who they can trust. Go

International Journal of Market Research (IJMR)

The world authority on research methodologies and techniques for professionals and academics. Go

Geodemographics Knowledge Base (GKB)

For people interested in the application of geodemographics and geo-spatial analysis. Go



[Digital first] means papers that have not yet appeared in print. See all

Peter Mouncey Blog

A pint of publicity, but a wee dram of supporting evidence?


Here’s an interesting situation for researchers. The news today contains a lead item on new research purporting to demonstrate that surveys underestimate real alcohol consumption, compared to sales. Even an interview with the lead researcher, Sadie Boniface of UCL on the BBC Today programme on R4 at prime-time.

Maybe the overall finding is not really surprising to many market researchers, not least, for example, due to the phenomenon of socially desirable behaviour when answering questions in a field such as alcohol consumption. However, I wanted to know more – especially about how consumption had been linked to sales.

The BBC website contains little method information, but hints that the item might be linked to the European Journal of Public Health.

The Guardian coverage is no better. A press release on the UCL website provides a little of the methodology, but not enough. However it confirms that the paper is published in the EJoPH as hinted at by the BBC.

Well, a look at their website shows nothing! If it’s there it is well hidden, and certainly not in the latest issue of that journal, published at the beginning of February.

Maybe I’ve missed something, but I’m sure that many researchers would like to investigate the basis for the claims, and what methodology was used. 

Two years ago, the MRS worked with the RSS and CIPR to produce guidelines for the use of statistics by the media.

In my view, research attracting high profile coverage needs to be easily traceable to the source, but unfortunately that is not always the case, despite the best endeavours of bodies such as the MRS, RSS & CIPR.

The research is hopefully based on very sound evidence, but how do we know?

Comments (2)

  • Anonymous | February 28, 2013 1:05 pm

    Yes, I agree there is a link to the existence of the paper, but as far as I can tell there's either a paywall or the need for am appropriate Athens password to get beyond the abstract.
  • Anonymous | February 27, 2013 7:22 pm

    Peter, The UCL Press Release at has a direct link to the paper at the foot of the page. It was published online yesterday. Or, if you go direct to the journal homepage, you find the paper in the section "Advance Access", as one would expect of a just-published paper. Not sure why you think it is "well hidden". Peter

Leave a reply

Please enter the 3 red symbols only